Hit Counter  




 

Legal Victory Can't Erase Nigerian Leader's Troubles - New York Times

LAGOS, Nigeria The last legal challenge to the legitimacy of President Umaru Yar'Adua was quashed by the Supreme Court last week, but he and Nigeria are far from out of the woods.
Although Mr. Yar'Adua, a former governor from a remote northern state, finally has a firm mandate to take charge of Nigeria, Africa's most populous and oil-rich country, he has accomplished so little in the 19 months since his flawed election that few believe that he can.
In its 4-to-3 decision on Friday in his favor, the Supreme Court did little to inspire confidence in the president or in the circumstances that brought him to power. While dismissing the suit brought by opposition leaders to overturn the April 2007 elections, the court conceded that widespread voting irregularities had occurred and severely chastised the national electoral commission for incompetence.
Even officials of the governing party said the president experienced a close call. Local and international observers had declared the elections fraudulent, marred by theft, violence and political intimidation. The chief lawyer for the electoral commission called the decision a “narrow escape for the president.”
Though Nigeria has a long history of corruption and misrule, opposition leaders did have some reason, however small, to hope for something different this time. In the past year, the electoral victories of several state governors were overturned in a series of local court rulings, inspiring moderate confidence in the growing independence of the judiciary.
However, most of the mandated revotes in those cases still resulted in victories for the governing Peoples Democratic Party. And in the latest case, few expected the Supreme Court to overturn the election of a president who had already been in office for more than a year.
“Nobody would want to rock the boat at this point, as badly as things are going,” said Namdi Obasi, an analyst with the International Crisis Group. Asked if the court ruling meant that Mr. Yar'Adua would now earnestly tackle Nigeria's many problems, Mr. Obasi said: “Absolutely not. There is not going to be any dramatic difference now in the way the country is governed. I think people are just counting the days until the next elections in 2011.”
Those days will probably go by slowly for the president. Plucked from obscurity by former President Olusegun Obasanjo, Mr. Yar'Adua, a former teacher, is the subject of widespread concerns about his health and doubts about his ability to govern.
Examples of his inefficiency abound. His efforts to shuffle important cabinet positions stalled for nearly a year. He has still not appointed a replacement for the health minister, ousted in a corruption scandal nine months ago.
His pledge to end corruption was undermined by the demotion and forced exile of the country's popular antigraft czar. After making the first concrete efforts to prosecute corrupt leaders, several of whom landed in jail, the official was driven into hiding after two attempts on his life.
There are also serious concerns about Mr. Yar'Adua's health, so much so that political insiders have already begun to speculate about a possible replacement. In the middle of the 2007 election campaign, Mr. Yar'Adua flew to Germany for undisclosed medical treatment, and he has traveled abroad for health reasons at least twice since his election.
In August, what was supposed to be a short religious pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia turned into a weeklong absence, during which rumors swirled. Officials played down the trip but acknowledged that he had undergone another minor treatment, again for an undisclosed ailment.
That the president of Africa's second-wealthiest country and its biggest oil exporter had to travel abroad for minor treatment speaks volumes about the state of services in Nigeria. The average Nigerian lives on less than $2 a day and has no reliable access to electricity, clean water or adequate health care.
At a cybercafe in Lagos, Nigeria's largest city, residents shrugged at news of the court decision. None were surprised, and none held out much hope for the rest of the Yar'Adua presidency.
“What can we do?” said Gbenga Biodun, 23, an accountant. “We just have to fold our arms and accept what our leaders do.” Patrons near him nodded in resignation.
“I knew there wouldn't be any surprises,” said Akinbode Oluwasemi, 40, a social worker and environmental activist. “It's a culmination of the fraud we saw at the election. If they suspended the election you would have seen jubilation in the streets. But as you can see no one was jubilating.”

 

Crude Oil Theft: JTF Hands  Over 22 Filipinos To EFCC

This exclusive internal memo of the ICPC was obtained by SaharaReporters, inside, there are details of a fraud perpetrated by the current Chairman of the People's Democratic Party (People Defrauding People-PDP) Vincent Ogbulafor. It speaks volumes about Yar'adua's "Zero Tolerance" for Corruption- PLEASE READ CAREFULLY!!!
INTERNAL MEMO
TO: TEAM 3 LEADER
FROM: PAUL AHMED BASSI

The Joint Task Force in the Niger Delta, Operation Restore Hope, on Tuesday, handed over 22 suspected Filipino oil thieves to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission for prosecution.
Our correspondent learnt that the JTF handed over the suspects at the agency's Port Harcourt zonal headquarters in the early hours of Tuesday.
The foreign nationals were apprehended aboard a bunkering vessel, MT AKUADA by the personnel of NNS Delta, Warri Naval Base, Delta State, three weeks ago.
The Filipinos were arrested at Escravos in Warri South-West Local Government Area of Delta State, while attempting to escape with stolen crude oil.
The ocean-going vessel which allegedly sailed into the creeks of Delta State to steal crude oil after 'due authorisation' by some unscrupulous officials of the JTF, was impounded by naval personnel who were not involved in the sharing of the loot taken from the illegal oil operators by the JTF's troops.
Operatives of the JTF have been criticised in recent times for aiding and abetting illegal oil deals in the areas under the jurisdiction of the security agency.
The critics of JTF's operations alleged that some officers were masterminding the crime of oil theft.
Some oil thieves had also accused JTF's officials of connivance in the wake of the arrest of an oil vessel in a coastal community in Delta State.
Meanwhile, the Coordinator, Joint Media Campaign Centre, JTF, Lt. Col. Rabe Abubakar, in a press statement on Tuesday, confirmed the handing over of the foreign nationals to the anti-graft agency.
Abubakar said the action was in line with the observation of due process and the rule of law as championed by the administration of President Umaru Yar'Adua.
He said the ocean-going vessel carried about 12,000 metric tonnes of stolen crude oil valued at about N1bn at the point of its arrest.
He said, “The arrest was made possible through the effective blockade of the creeks by the JTF. The war on oil theft has reduced the level of criminality associated with oil theft in the oil rich region.
“The campaign to stamp out illegal oil activities in the region is a continuous one and there will be no retreat no surrender until the security outfit achieves its desired objective.
“Similarly, troops on patrol of the waterways intercepted and apprehended a wooden boat loaded with 76 x 200 litres of drums of diesel illegally refined at Sapele Waterside. One suspect was arrested during the operation.”.    

Brig.-Gen. Rimtip

 

Igbinedion Convicted, Fined

A former Edo State Governor, Chief Lucky Igbinedion, was on Thursday convicted on a one-count charge of corruption by the Federal High Court, Enugu.
Igbinedion will, however, not go to jail as he was merely fined N3.6m.
The light sentence was the result of a plea-bargain arrangement the former governor entered into with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.
But the commission, which arraigned him alongside four companies in which he had interests in, rejected the judgment, saying it would go on appeal.
The EFCC, which had filed a 191-count charge of corruption, money laundering and embezzlement against Igbinedion and the companies made a volte face on Wednesday by dropping the charges. It filed an amended 24-count but arraigned him on just a count.
Igbenedion, who had earlier pleaded not guilty to the 191-count charge, admitted being liable to the one-count charge one-count charge.
The single charge reads, "That you, Lucky 19binedion (former governor of Edo State) on or about January 21, 2008, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court neglected to make a declaration of your interest in the account No. 41240113983110 with GTBank in the declaration of Assets Form of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and you thereby committed an offence punishable under section 27(3) of the EFCC Act, 2004."

The second accused, Kiva Corporation, was convicted on two of the 23 count charge levelled against it and ordered to pay N500m fine and to forfeit its landed properties.
The properties include a parcel of land at Asokoro, Abuja, a detached building on two plots comprising four bedroom and two outer houses in GRA, Benin, and a storey building also in Benin, to the Federal Government.
Igbinedion, who came with a few of his aides, paid the fine within minutes after the verdict and was driven away in a white Peugeot 307 marked Nasarawa AG 16 NSW.
During the proceedings, the prosecuting counsel, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs, informed the court that the EFCC had withdrawn the charges against the accused and filed amended charges against them.

The former governor thereafter, entered the dock where he pleaded guilty.
Jacobs had told the court that the former governor failed to disclose in his assets declaration form that he had N3, 579, 524.16 in his GTBank account.
He tendered five exhibits, including the certified true copy of the assets declaration form, the statement of account of Kiva Corporation which showed how monies were paid into the GTBank account; and payment vouchers from the Edo State Government House showing how monies were withdrawn and lodged into the account of the company.
The index of payment received from government house showing withdrawals and payments of money to the company was also tendered. The prosecution urged the court to consider the ingredients under count two and three where payments totaling N30m was made to Kiva Corporation on January 10, 2007 and another sum of N70m paid to the same company on May 17, 2007 by one Pat Eboigbodin, an Edo State Government official.
"These showed that the company retained the proceed of crime and Your Lordship is empowered under section 16 of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act 2004 to convict the accused for the offence," Jacob said.
It urged the court to take the facts as stated and to convict accordingly.
Igbinedion's lawyer, Mr. Adetunji Oyeyipo (SAN), did not object.
The former governor was then directed to confirm the ingredients of the facts which he did.
Shortly before Justice Abdullahi Kafarati adjourned to prepare the judgment, Oyeyipo made an allocutus (plea for mitigation of sentence).
He prayed the court to consider the fact that his client voluntarily returned to the country from a foreign trip when he learnt that the EFCC had filed charges against him.
Oyeyipo said, "Your Lordship would observe that on occasions when he was granted leave to travel, he had always returned to face trial.
"Even when he acquired the e-passport, without any prompting, he submitted the passport to the court·. The accused was charged with neglecting to make a declaration of assets, but he didn't willfully refuse or knowingly refuse to disclose his interest in an account.
"The amount in the account as stated by the prosecution is N3, 579, 524.16; this is not an amount he would ordinarily want to hide. My Lord, the account is that of a first offender and this offence is a strict liability offence.
"Taking the circumstances into consideration, the status of the accused before he became Edo State Governor and also as a former governor, we respectfully urge your Lordship to impose the mildest punishment sir, particularly, having regards to section 382 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act which is applicable in this count."
In his judgment, Justice Kafarati convicted Igbinedion and Kiva Corporation as charged by virtue of the facts and exhibits presented before him.
Kafarati took cognisance of what he called the demeanor of the accused and the severity of his offence before pronouncing the verdict.
He said, "Having considered the charge against the first accused and since the amount is negligible, he is therefore sentenced to a fine ofN3, 579, 524.16, being the amount in the GTBank account he failed to declare.
"He should be remanded in EFCC custody until he pays the fine," the judge ordered.
Oyeyipo thanked the judge for the 'wise exercise' of his power.
But the EFCC later issued a statement in which it said that it was disappointed by the judgment of the court.
It claimed in the statement by its Head, Media and Publicity, Mr. Femi Babafemi, that it "would rather go the long way of prosecution than to settle for a plea-bargain verdict that has no bite or will not serve any deterrence purpose."
The statement reads, 'The former governor had sought for a plea-bargain in the course of his prosecution by the EFCe. The outcome of the exercise at the court in Enugu however fell short of our expectation.
"It is believed that the essence of a plea-bargain is not only for suspects to forfeit the proceeds of crime but that such should go with a sentence which will serve as deterrent.
"In view of this development, the Chairman of the EFCC, Mrs. Farida Waziri, has instructed the commission's counsel to file an appeal against the verdict immediately. "
Oyeyipo later told journalists that the summary of the charges against his client "either in their original or amended form, bordered on the use of security votes or utilisation of duty tour allowance.”
The Senior Advocate added that the experience of his client in the past 11 months had been humbling and traumatic.
Jacobs, in an interview with our correspondent, said he was neither happy nor sad over the judgment.
He said, "The judge exercised his discretion in sentencing the accused, so there was nothing we could do. I may appeal if directed to do so, but the fact that the accused is convicted is enough."

Back

 



For  comments or information on this website please email info@Thehumanitytodayonline.com
© 2008 The Humanity Today, A Publication of Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law All Rights Reserved.

 

Mission